home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=94TT0252>
- <title>
- Feb. 28, 1994: Ducking The Homeless Bill
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1994
- Feb. 28, 1994 Ministry of Rage:Louis Farrakhan
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- THE BUDGET, Page 42
- Ducking The Homeless Bill
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>The White House shies from a fiscal trade-off
- </p>
- <p> Neglect of the homeless was one Reagan-Bush legacy Bill Clinton
- angrily promised to change. Last spring the President ordered
- three members of his Cabinet to study the problem and propose
- bold solutions. Last week they did, in a private report to the
- White House that concluded that the nation's homeless population
- may have totaled as many as 7 million in the late 1980s--far
- higher than any current estimate. The report, signed by Housing
- and Urban Development Secretary Henry Cisneros, Health and Human
- Services' Donna Shalala and Veterans Affairs chief Jesse Brown,
- proposed spending large new sums on subsidized housing, mental
- health and other programs.
- </p>
- <p> All well and good--except the document dodges the issue of
- how to finance such a plan or even how to estimate what it may
- cost. This was a curious oversight inasmuch as the same report
- specifically targets a rich source of funds: the billions of
- dollars in mortgage-interest tax deductions granted to the wealthiest
- one-fifth of American families.
- </p>
- <p> The tax code, notes the report, grants middle- and upper-class
- Americans more in housing subsidies than poor people get, at
- a cost of $41 billion last year--85% of which went to the
- most affluent taxpayers. But the report makes no proposal for
- changing the mortgage-interest tax deduction.
- </p>
- <p> Officials deny they are avoiding a tough political choice. "We
- talk about it, but we don't say, `Let's take on the middle class'
- because it will never happen," says an Administration official.
- "The middle-class mortgage deduction is a major economic generator.
- And if you slowed the economy because you reduced mortgage deductions,
- who did you really help? Nobody."
- </p>
- <p> That argument begs the point. The issue: whether the Administration
- is willing to limit those deductions for Americans who can afford
- half-million-dollar homes and second homes.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-